April 27, 2026
A member of the House of Representatives, , is facing growing criticism following a constituency empowerment programme that featured the distribution of luxury cars, cash, and other items in Rivers State.
The lawmaker, who represents Etche/Omuma Federal Constituency, came under scrutiny after civic technology organisation questioned the priorities behind the initiative, describing it as a questionable use of public resources.
In a report released on Monday, the organisation highlighted that the programme included the distribution of cars, motorcycles, sewing machines, hair dryers, and financial support to selected beneficiaries—items presented as development interventions.
However, MonITNG argued that such initiatives, while often publicly celebrated, should be carefully examined, especially when funded with taxpayer money.
“It is important to critically reflect on what true constituency development should look like when millions of naira in public funds are involved,” the group stated.
The organisation expressed concern over the state of basic infrastructure across Etche and Omuma communities, noting that many residents continue to face serious challenges despite ongoing government spending.
According to the report, schools in the area remain in poor condition, with inadequate learning materials and dilapidated classrooms, while health centres reportedly lack essential equipment and qualified personnel.
MonITNG questioned the decision to prioritise high-value giveaways instead of long-term investments capable of benefiting a wider population.
“The prioritisation of cars and consumable items raises serious concerns about development priorities and whether constituency projects are addressing the most urgent needs of the people,” it said.
The group further warned against reducing empowerment programmes to selective distributions that benefit only a limited number of individuals, often tied to political structures.
“Empowerment should not be reduced to isolated giveaways. When public funds serve only a few, it drifts away from the goal of inclusive and sustainable development,” the report added.
While acknowledging that some distributed items may support individual livelihoods, MonITNG maintained that such interventions cannot replace critical public infrastructure like functional schools, well-equipped hospitals, and accessible water systems.
The organisation concluded by stressing that constituents deserve measurable and visible development across essential sectors, rather than periodic displays of generosity.
“Public funds must remain a trust for collective progress. Real representation is measured by impact, not display,” it said.
